News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns imp... by jeduehr on Thursday May 27, 2021 @07:50AM (#27301883)
I will say this is something we've known for a while: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27885658/
Re:Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns imp... by mhb on Thursday May 27, 2021 @09:16AM (#27302694)
This is not what the study addressed - the study is about contact with premature babies which is typically withheld until they are stable. The outcomes are better if the skin-to-skin contact is initiated before they are stable.
Re:Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns imp... by PragmaticPulp on Thursday May 27, 2021 @09:08AM (#27302615)
Yes, and it’s standard practice in hospitals.

Additionally, our doctor prescribed a certain quota of skin-to-skin contact daily for the first several weeks after birth.

Re:Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns imp... by drknownuffin on Thursday May 27, 2021 @11:08AM (#27304018)
Skin-to-skin is standard. Skin-to-skin for unstable neonates is not, which is the debate in the medical field and the question that the study sought to answer.