News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LA pays $2600 per homeless tent, per month by mikepurvis on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @11:05PM (#27298901)
That assumes there are market incentives to actually fill the housing that is built. What about when buildings of hundreds of luxury condos are built and they just sit empty, either owned by disinterested "investors" or unwilling to be sold for the market-directed price?

Someone who studied this in Toronto by overlaying nighttime photos to find units where the lights are literally never on: https://www.movesmartly.com/articles/condo-units-sitting-emp...

Re:LA pays $2600 per homeless tent, per month by tylerhou on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @11:20PM (#27299004)
That blogpost you cited says that there is a 5% vacancy rate. That's well within the normal range. So I don't see how it supports your argument.

https://www.reddit.com/r/badeconomics/comments/musne8/dispro...

Re:LA pays $2600 per homeless tent, per month by mikepurvis on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @11:44PM (#27299160)
Fair— I kind of picked one at random. Obviously part of the point of that dude's effort is that this is a difficult thing to get numbers on. Here's some other coverage around responses to a planned vacant unit tax:

https://www.blogto.com/real-estate-toronto/2021/02/real-esta...

Re:LA pays $2600 per homeless tent, per month by imtringued on Thursday May 27, 2021 @07:36AM (#27301772)
Raise capital gains taxes on land. If they don't sell or rent it's their loss.
Re:LA pays $2600 per homeless tent, per month by ajmurmann on Thursday May 27, 2021 @12:34AM (#27299448)
If you build more prices will come down and these "investments" will become nonviable.
Re:LA pays $2600 per homeless tent, per month by mikepurvis on Thursday May 27, 2021 @10:02AM (#27303247)
Maybe, but that is difficult when a) the "investors" are split between connected, powerful people who really don't want to see their investments go negative; and families just getting started who could be utterly ruined by an underwater mortgage, and b) the fact that the housing situation is a crisis now; there isn't time to faff around and hope that ten to twenty years the invisible hand of the market does this or that.