Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by tolbish on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @09:33PM
(#27298357)
Any evidence that it came from the lab?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by btmorex on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @09:55PM
(#27298478)
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/25/politics/wuhan-lab-covid-orig...
US intelligence reports that researchers from the virology lab in Wuhan were hospitalized with an unknown illness in November of 2019, most notably before the "patient #0" was infected.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by ggggtez on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @09:41PM
(#27298391)
It seems recently they uncovered evidence that patient 0 never visited any wet markets. Among some other head scratchers. Fauci says it's a coin flip, 50/50 odds it came from a lab.
More research is necessary, but it's worth keeping your mind open to new evidence.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by SignalNotSecure on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @09:56PM
(#27298497)
To answer that we need to know what happened to / where is Shi Zhengli?
Are her social media accounts now empty shells run by the state to pretend she is still around?
Her history is spooky. And there is no evidence she is still alive.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by sillysaurusx on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @10:27PM
(#27298657)
Hm, this took a turn. As someone who hasn't heard anything about this, where should I start digging?
Her wikipedia page seems sterile, and searching her name doesn't bring up anything about possible death.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by SignalNotSecure on Thursday May 27, 2021 @07:53AM
(#27301909)
She didn't necessarily die. I wish we knew more about her actions since the start of the pandemic because her role in all this is central.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by vore on Thursday May 27, 2021 @03:39AM
(#27300393)
Cite sources for these claims. Otherwise, this is just unsubstantiated conspiracy mongering.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by aftbit on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @10:34PM
(#27298705)
Here is my favorite roundup on the subject:
https://project-evidence.github.io/
In my own amateur opinion, either natural crossover or laboratory escape theories are plausible but we'll almost certainly never be able to prove it either way.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by msie on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @09:55PM
(#27298487)
Some say it couldn’t have been designed: https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-not-human-made-in-la...
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by aj7 on Thursday May 27, 2021 @01:25AM
(#27299696)
Reading between the lines, they started out by “designing” i.e. choosing genetic sequences. But they found out it was more efficient to generate more virulent viruses simply by natural selection in mouse and human respiratory cell cultures.
Re:Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer scienc...
by SignalNotSecure on Thursday May 27, 2021 @04:42PM
(#27308201)
Similar to how Monsanto chooses herbicide resistant strains of seeds compatible with glyphosate