Nominal inflation is fairly well hidden from people. The prices of most goods remain relatively static, or at least stay within a narrow band over an annual cycle. Producers have contracts for fixed prices on inputs and often outputs, so their prices are often fixed for a term. Frosted Flakes may remain $3.99 a box for five years, while a price increase to $4.49 is introduced gradually through sales and promotions.

So if people are experiencing inflation in the short term, that's notable.

Now, it's important to differentiate between inflation due to supply constraints vs. inflation due to long-term cost increases on inputs. For example, lumber is hella expensive right now, but it's probably not going to remain at the levels it is at in the long term. Whereas the cost increases of corn might be permanent.

At my local supermarket the price for food varies week to week depending on whether an item is on sale. For example sometimes items are "2 of 3.00" and sometimes they are 2.00 each. Unless someone is keeping records it would be hard to gauge.

67% of field corn is used for ethanol or animal feed. But regardless, only 10% of the price change in wholesale corn is passed on to consumers:

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2008/february/corn-pric...

And the government heavily subsidizes crops.

The issue is not really how much of the price increase are passed along to consumers, rather, are these prices increases permanent?

Doubtful. Electric autos will decrease demand for ethanol. The Govt will increase subsidizes as well to provide price stability.

Just a quick correction due to a copy-and-paste error, the article quote is: "86% indicated they experience price increases on everyday goods and services."

That said, I agree, inflation isn't a problem, the rate of inflation is.

I also think folks, right now, are confusing price increases due to supply or demand shocks with inflation.

Housing, cars, computer chips, and many other products are experiencing a mix of a supply shock and a demand shock as last year's decisions to reduce production have bitten us as demand is coming roaring back and production can't be instantaneously re-adjusted for that demand.

That is causing a spike in prices that's rippling through the economy in various ways, from increases in prices of lumber to a spike in used car demand.

This is a fleeting effect that'll go on until supply chains catch up.

The problem is the outcome looks the same: price increases. But the policy response has to be very very different.

It’s a propaganda piece. The point is to instill poor people with a fear of inflation to promote sentiment against redistribution, which is done by relating it with their everyday lives. Quality reporting is not the priority.