Re:The Faux Generosity of the Super-Wealthy: Why Bill Gates ...
by johnorourke on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @01:58AM
(#27286894)
Huge leaps in logic like "clinical trial failed" == "sponsor wants to kill people", and the passive tone, makes me think the author was on a tight deadline and a specific topic but doesnt fully believe what they're writing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Faux Generosity of the Super-Wealthy: Why Bill Gates ...
by thunderbong on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @02:13AM
(#27286995)
Really. It feels the writer decided an overall point that we wants to portray, and then uses words to justify it. This is not journalism, this reads more like shilling.
Re:The Faux Generosity of the Super-Wealthy: Why Bill Gates ...
by refurb on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @02:10AM
(#27286971)
This is actually a great approach to evaluating articles like this. Remember, writing stories is a job too - shitty deadlines, writers block, pressure to come up with something, having to pitch your boss on why your idea is a good one.
You suddenly realize that nobody is reporting the news to educate people. They are doing it to: 1) get a paycheck, 2) sell add space, 3) get more clicks, etc.
Not saying all reporting is false. It’s just good to keep in mind what the incentives are.