Re:All Is Orwell
by young_unixer on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @04:37PM
(#27282300)
> Hayekian neoliberalism
That very concept is a nonsensical. No Hayekian economist or ideologue calls themselves neoliberal.
Hayek himself used the term "neo-liberal" to describe the "movement" of liberalism to which he belonged [0]. The historian Quinn Slobodian [1] advocates using the term "neoliberal" for the intellectual history surrounding the Mont Pelerin Society. In this context, it is sensible to distinguish between a Hayekian strand and, say, Wilhelm Röpke's version of neoliberalism.
[0] The Freeman, 1952. https://mises.org/library/freeman-july-1952-b
[1] Globalists. The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism.
Re:All Is Orwell
by young_unixer on Thursday May 27, 2021 @07:50PM
(#27310061)
Thanks. I didn't know that. My bad.
There were good reasons why Bretton Woods failed in 1970, but the subsequent ascendance of Hayekian neoliberalism doesn't look so good 40 years on.