News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Researchhub: GitHub for Science. Parent comment

Re:Researchhub: GitHub for Science by surround on Monday May 24, 2021 @11:22PM (#27272280)
It looks a lot more like "reddit for science." There's voting, comments, subreddits (hubs), and /all.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchhub: GitHub for Science by SV_BubbleTime on Monday May 24, 2021 @11:39PM (#27272356)
Yes I find the best science is debated and evaluated with an up and down arrow.

And double extra bonus points if you can hide other people’s work from view if you don’t agree with it!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchhub: GitHub for Science by Tabular-Iceberg on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @10:59AM (#27277664)
That to me is the scariest thing of all.

Science can't work if unpopular and controversial results are not given fair consideration. By all means, bad methodologies and conclusions that do not follow from the premises should be picked to pieces, but we can do without downvote campaigns and snarky "Big yikes, sweaty, don't you know that has been debunked already?" comments.

Edit: thanks for the ResearchCoin, kind stranger!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchhub: GitHub for Science by tomrod on Monday May 24, 2021 @11:32PM (#27272323)
And ~doge~ research coin!

I'm not sure I understand this.

[ Parent | on HN ]