Re:Why did bar ends go away from mountain bikes?
by bigfudge on Monday May 24, 2021 @04:12PM
(#27269145)
I’m not sure the low slack bikes in vogue now really do climb better tho. Head tube angle is a direct trade off between performance up and down hill.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why did bar ends go away from mountain bikes?
by petre on Monday May 24, 2021 @04:32PM
(#27269359)
Seat tube too. I have a fixed fork mountain bike with 67/74.5° head tube vs seat tube angles and a gravel bike with the classic 71/73° or what used to be classic on XC bikes. The gravel bike climbs really well with a higher gear but I wouldn't tank over bumpy terrain with it, the mountain bike is really stable on descents and on flats, climbs okay. Of course a MTB with 63/78° like the new Marin El Roy probably doesn't climb that well?
Re:Why did bar ends go away from mountain bikes?
by PragmaticPulp on Monday May 24, 2021 @06:48PM
(#27270598)
You should try some of the newer bike geometries. It's amazing what they can get away with.
I'd take a modern slack head tube geometry over an older bike for climbing any day. I've owned plenty of bikes through the years and I'm not going back.