Re:How to get rich without being lucky (2019)
by TheCoelacanth on Saturday May 22, 2021 @10:26PM
(#27251953)
A better way to describe that is that buying a house with a mortgage is a leveraged investment.
The mortgage is the opposite of an asset.
Re:How to get rich without being lucky (2019)
by sombremesa on Sunday May 23, 2021 @12:44AM
(#27252522)
It seems like you’re in a black and white world. Look up what asset means - it’s more than just antonym to liability.
Re:How to get rich without being lucky (2019)
by MispelledToyota on Sunday May 23, 2021 @11:47AM
(#27255855)
The whole point of accounting is to force black and white distinctions, especially in ambiguous situations. But in fact there is no ambiguity about this. Owing someone money doesn't earn you money. Owning an asset that you may have acquired with a loan is what earns you money.
Re:How to get rich without being lucky (2019)
by MispelledToyota on Saturday May 22, 2021 @10:14PM
(#27251910)
I totally agree. I'm making the narrow point that a mortgage is a debt, and classified as a liability. A house is an asset. The benefit of purchasing real estate with leverage vs cash doesn't change how they sit on a balance sheet.
Personally I argue to everyone they should put down as little as possible for the reasons you're stating.
Imagine you have 20 million. Should you buy a million dollar house outright, or get a mortgage? Look at the prime rate today and compare it with expected market returns over the life of a mortgage.
This is without even considering the ground reality of renting a place (which is the common alternative), where rents are liable to rise perpetually, and without considering a plethora of other factors which contribute to calling a mortgage an asset.
Of course, if you can get by without needing to pay for shelter at all, you should do that.