News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by threeseed on Friday May 21, 2021 @07:48PM (#27241423)
iPad Pro supports ethernet and general USB devices.

And allowing apps to sniff network traffic defeats the entire security model of the device which many of us like.

I want more privacy and security in my devices not less.

Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by skohan on Friday May 21, 2021 @08:40PM (#27241963)
How does it defeat your security if other people want to look at network traffic on the device they purchased?
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by threeseed on Saturday May 22, 2021 @06:39AM (#27245255)
Because I don't want apps to be actually sniffing traffic whilst pretending to be something else.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by skohan on Saturday May 22, 2021 @11:14AM (#27247305)
You could solve this with OS-level permissions for this kind of thing, the same way Apple now handles cross-app tracking
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by lupinglade on Friday May 21, 2021 @08:31PM (#27241879)
Sniffing network traffic would not defeat anything, provided you are prompted about the necessary permissions.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by chongli on Friday May 21, 2021 @09:55PM (#27242504)
The problem with those permission prompts is that many users blindly accept them. If a “sniff all network traffic” permission were allowed, it would take all of one day before Facebook et al release an update with it and start siphoning millions of users network traffic.

Apple does not want this.

Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire by skohan on Saturday May 22, 2021 @11:17AM (#27247341)
Apple would probably also prefer it if I had to use an in-app purchase to pay my rent, but luckily we live in a nation of laws, and Apple doesn't get to decide everything based on unilateral self-interest.