“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

Re:“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf] by scrps on Friday May 21, 2021 @01:22PM (#27237010)

OP stated the sponsor pulled the box after they no longer wanted to support freenode. How would the former staff have handled that more professionally? Begging the sponsor not revoke access?

If I were a sponsor who found out a project I was donating resources to was taken over under questionable circumstances by someone with deep pockets I'd have done the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf] by sillysaurusx on Friday May 21, 2021 @01:30PM (#27237108)

Yeah, you're right. I guess it wasn't up to the volunteers; sorry.

It wasn't a very nice move by the sponsor to yank support without giving any notice – usually you'd get a week, or 30 days, or something – but it sounds like no one had any obligations to.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf] by tallship on Friday May 21, 2021 @04:12PM (#27239293)

I recall just a few months ago when Amazon yanked the plug on hosting a company's infra with little more than 24hrs notice.

So I guess that's precedence for something like that, and yet, that company held a contract with Amazon to host their infra.... no such scenario in this case ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf] by PaulDavisThe1st on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:35PM (#27240255)

There was substantially more than 24 hrs ... amzn sent several communications to Parler explaining their issues with what Parler was (or was not doing). The final communication had a 24hr deadline.

[ Parent | on HN ]