Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

Re:Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid ... by cool_dude85 on Friday May 21, 2021 @09:56AM (#27234018)

>I am not sure why you think anyone or any company would DESIRE to have external actors imposes requirements on their actions or why it would be unpalatable to say you do not want to have regulatory burdens imposes on you

Of course they desire to have external actors impose requirements on their own actions and other people's actions and other companies' actions. Just so long as they think those requirements benefit their bottom lines.

Ever hear of the business lobby opposing union-busting laws on the basis that they create regulatory burden?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid ... by syshum on Friday May 21, 2021 @10:44AM (#27234634)

union "busting" laws generally speaking are about REMOVING regulations around who is required by law to negotiate with and/or join a union. So these laws by definition are not imposing any regulatory burden on anyone they are removing regulatory burdens

[ Parent | on HN ]