Re:U.S. has almost 500k job openings in cybersecurity
by extrapickles on Thursday May 20, 2021 @08:41AM
(#27220364)
Security unfortunately is a creative process, which is hard to get consistent. I would love to use something like statistical product control, but I have yet to see a good way to apply it (or similar techniques) without forcing pen-tests to be “follow the checklist”.
Re:U.S. has almost 500k job openings in cybersecurity
by extrapickles on Thursday May 20, 2021 @09:21AM
(#27220764)
I should add that burnout is a massive problem when it comes to quality. Even if you found a good consultant (or group of), for round #2, they could have just finished testing all of your competitors products and are now worn out.
Scheduling in variety to try and prevent partial burnout is difficult if everyone in a vertical only wants to use the same person.
Re:U.S. has almost 500k job openings in cybersecurity
by TecoAndJix on Thursday May 20, 2021 @08:26AM
(#27220251)
This is a good perspective. I pushed for a higher priced pen test firm in our last engagement due their name/reputation (i was sick of nessus scan outputs) but ultimately their price was just SO MUCH cheaper than the prestigious named one. I couldn't provide a justification to leadership outside of "they have these awesome writeups in their research division". Asking to see a sample report to prospective firm turns out to be a crapshoot as well (but seems to be one of the few things to go off of). Can you provide any insight on how you evaluate?
A few of them have distinguished themselves, slightly, in the first year of a multi-year contract -- and then regressed to the mean in the rest.
Quoted prices vary by a factor of 4, approximately. Work done does not. Quality of work appears to be basically independent of price.
Arrogance scales with price, though.
Even if you are a non-checklist firm, I can't justify hiring you at a higher price because I can't differentiate you from the bloviators, and basically nothing you say other than "I am ptacek" can change that.