> once again, you have merely just assumed the role of arbitor. What makes this opinion better than the opposition?

This is literally the role of legislators. What makes "my" opinion better, is in the event that this sort of legislation passed, the majority of the elective representatives in both houses agree we should ban proof of work crytpo currencies, nothing less, nothing more.

> [alternative proposal]

I mean, I happen to like this proposal too, but you haven't given any reason not to do both...