News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ghosts of Unix past, part 3: Unfixable designs (2010) by a1369209993 on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @12:47AM (#27191347)
Isn't this easily fixed by counting held processes via pidfd towards RLIMIT_NPROC? You'd get a rlimit error when calling pidfd_open, but it already returns EMFILE for RLIMIT_NOFILE, so that doesn't seem onerous unless you're trying to enforce exact numbers of processes rather than "less than some reasonable limit".

Edit: note that pidfds holding same-uid processes have no effect (that process already belongs to your uid), and multiple processes holding a single foreign process only count once (that single foreign process is counted toward your NPROC, since it will stick around for pidfd even if its user kills it).

There are no comments on this comment yet.