News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio by marcodiego on Monday May 17, 2021 @10:18AM (#27183694)
Personal experience: most people can not differentiate anything above 128kbps mp3. Some can, but don't care. A lot of people listen to music in noisy environments with lower quality blue-tooth devices that decrease audio quality even more and make it way harder to differentiate from anything better than 128kbps mp3. Most current music is heavily dynamic compressed leaving very little space to differentiate better codecs. And the new generation of listeners is getting so used to compression artifacts that a cleaner sound may feel strange and unfamiliar.
Re:Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio by robbyt on Monday May 17, 2021 @10:24AM (#27183764)
Who are these people who can't hear the difference? And what sort of listen setup have you used to test this? Even my parents can hear the difference!
Re:Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio by em500 on Monday May 17, 2021 @11:38AM (#27184688)
The German c't magazin did an extensive test back in 2000 using pricey audiophille equipment (Sennheiser Orpheus, B&W Nautilus 803). 256k MP3 was statistically tied with the Compact Disc source.

Translated article: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?topic=27324.0

Re:Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio by marcodiego on Monday May 17, 2021 @10:32AM (#27183860)
Re:Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio by kevindong on Monday May 17, 2021 @11:01AM (#27184235)
If I really strain myself, I can tell the difference between 128 and 320. But I never put that much effort into listening/appreciating music.