Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by tshaddox on Sunday May 16, 2021 @06:38PM
(#27177723)
I suspect a court would tend to take the existence of the smart contract as a pretty clear indication of the intent of the involved parties. But of course if you’re entering a significant commercial agreement like this you had better make an explicit traditional contract as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.