Re:The Suez Canal will be widened
by LatteLazy on Sunday May 16, 2021 @09:05AM
(#27173440)
I don't think it suggests that at all. The engineers built ships that were as large as possible while still passing the canal. There were no plans to enlarge the canal. I don't see a mistake there except for the politicians who decided the fix the canals size then changed their minds...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Suez Canal will be widened
by FridayoLeary on Sunday May 16, 2021 @09:16AM
(#27173507)
They are not changing their minds arbitrarily, it's in response to the fact that as the Evergiven demonstrated, so-called Suezmax ships actually don't fit. In reality, they are "Suezbarelys"
They fit fine. There was an issue with that ship having large sail area from all those containers and insufficient control authority to counteract the added wind forces.
If anything they may want to limit Max crossing to calm days. Also the crew's judgement should be examined: wind forces in tight quarters are a big concern for any vessel and yet they decided to enter.
If there are a bunch of conditions under which Suezmax ships fit (calm days, above-average crew judgment, etc.) isn't that effectively support for Suezmax being more of a Suezbarely?
Isn't that exactly what suezmax means? SuezBarely?
If you ask for a Xm long ship, you get an Xm long ship. That's not a design flaw because it crashes more easily than a smaller ship when not maintained/piloted properly...
Edit: if the Suez officials are serious about this, they should limit the size of vessels to the current maximum.
Re:The Suez Canal will be widened
by doctor_eval on Sunday May 16, 2021 @09:31AM
(#27173583)
I think the point is, the Suez canal operators say "you must be no more than THIS BIG to pass through the canal".
So shipbuilder builds a ship THIS BIG and it doesn't fit. [0]
I think that's the canal's fault, not the shipbuilder's.
[0] in fact, most of the time it fits, but sometimes it doesn't.
Re:The Suez Canal will be widened
by FridayoLeary on Sunday May 16, 2021 @09:35AM
(#27173612)
No. You don't completely fill up your computer memory. Whenever we are given a certain amount of space within which to operate, when smooth flow of traffic is essential, we aim to stay below the absolute maximum limits, in order to avoid fatal bottlenecks. This is very logical, and you can see it in all aspects of life.
You don't fill up computer memory because it's cheap to buy more and catastrophic to run out. Imagine if you were paid to fill computer memory, and the only way to stay in business was to be 99% full. You'd fill your memory then. And that's logistics. That's by ships are so big and full and why planes are over booked and why Suez hasn't been enlarged more.