n.One who wastes, especially one who wastes money; a profligate
n.An idler or a loafer.
n.Anything cast away as spoiled in the making, or bad; waste; refuse.
He wants people to see him as a scoundrel with a heart of gold. Nothing I've seen from him has been regretful or contrite.
However this must all have been clear from day 1 so this can only be a PR move on Apple’s behalf which is not a great look either.
There are no winners in this story, only losers. Including society which got thrown yet another polarising piece of social media drama.
Which hill do you think is appropriate? The line has to be drawn at least a standard deviation below average behaviour or there will be a lot of unemployed people. Especially with the context that nearly everyone has socially unacceptable views, most just usually try not to talk about them.
I'm sure it'll come out in the conversation, but none of the commentors are rushing to accuse him of doing anything. It takes 2 to get a woman pregnant.
That is a bit of an escalation from being an ideologue. What are you actually unhappy about here? What do you think he's done?
> This is about a awful person who should not be hired into a leadership role...
Well again, being an awful person and being unqualified for leadership are different things and need to be argued separately.
There are lots of great business leaders who were awful people. Eg, Henry Ford was awarded the Grand Cross of the German Eagle by the Nazis. It isn't like the ranks of business have or ever will be made up of exclusively nice or praiseworthy people.
What does a 'red pill ideologue' mean? Yes, I've seen the Matrix but I don't understand
But wow, that Reddit post is shocking
It is called "red pill" because of the idea that it is the real truth of this world.
Or you could look at the most extreme examples the other commenters are trying to present as the norm.
[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5b4tqe/i_am_antonio_g...
Edit:
* added citation
* changed "the hill you want" to "the hill anyone wants"