Re:FBI Has Gained Access to Sci-Hub Founder's Apple Account,...
by sthnblllII on Friday May 14, 2021 @05:01PM
(#27159643)
>Mueller declared in his public hearing that he would have indicted Trump, if he wasn't president.
Is that true though? He didn't present any evidence of a crime. Congress could have impeached Trump successfully with some hard evidence, so was Muller protecting Trump by only insinuating there was evidence but not presenting any? I don't think vague connections "says enough". If the president really was conspiring with Russia I would want the FBI to present its findings instead of giving more vague insinuation.
Re:FBI Has Gained Access to Sci-Hub Founder's Apple Account,...
by gebruikersnaam on Friday May 14, 2021 @05:19PM
(#27159829)
"Mueller: A president can be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office" [1]
Statements that Congress could have impeached Trump can only be viewed as stated in bad faith. Congress did impeach Trump, but for political reasons the Senate refused to remove him.
[1] https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/24/rober...
The fact that the Senate committee (led by the Republicans) also found plenty of connections between the Russia government and the Trump campaign says enough.