Cloudflare’s CAPTCHA replacement with FIDO2/WebAuthn is a bad idea

Re:Cloudflare’s CAPTCHA replacement with FIDO2/WebAuthn is a... by timlardner on Friday May 14, 2021 @09:52AM (#27154304)

That doesn't sound unreasonable. Out of interest, what would you consider a ridiculous speed to be crawling at?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cloudflare’s CAPTCHA replacement with FIDO2/WebAuthn is a... by LinuxBender on Friday May 14, 2021 @10:35AM (#27154767)

I can't speak for Cloudflare, but crawling speed should be dictated by the site owner via the robots.txt crawl-delay. [1] A site owner could also rate-limit unauthenticated requests by IP via the cloudflare header using a 429 too many requests error page.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots_exclusion_standard#Craw...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cloudflare’s CAPTCHA replacement with FIDO2/WebAuthn is a... by o-__-o on Friday May 14, 2021 @06:11PM (#27160236)

This here is the problem. It’s a new time no one wants to be Rfc compliant, just go behind a service and problem is solved.

So no problem, time to move on web search is no longer exciting

[ Parent | on HN ]