News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Getting High-Speed Rail Wrong by tpmx on Thursday May 13, 2021 @04:55PM (#27147322)
There are four tracks - that enables the combination of a slow local stop-at-every-station service along with a fast feeder service.

But then the bizarre/historic track geometry ruins the fast service...

Re:Getting High-Speed Rail Wrong by lmm on Thursday May 13, 2021 @10:54PM (#27150163)
So the fast service shouldn't use that alignment. There must already be population centers that are skipped by the fast service - its tracks don't have to go through there either.
Re:Getting High-Speed Rail Wrong by bobthepanda on Friday May 14, 2021 @11:20AM (#27155208)
Today the fast services follow the same alignment.

Rerouting so far has been a headache; in New Haven-Boston where the tracks are so curvy new tracks have to be built, the FRA proposed going through entirely different population centers (the geography of the existing coast line is very challenging). This has resulted in an interesting fight where people want the train in their town, but also do not want the impact of newly constructed tracks through their town.