Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by nstj on Thursday May 13, 2021 @12:14PM
(#27143855)
What about when the cost of having the data exposed to the public is higher than that of recovery
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by ben509 on Thursday May 13, 2021 @12:47PM
(#27144331)
Yeah, I was pushing that all under "recovery." Say it all sums to $C.
Arguably the bigger problem is you don't know that the ransomer will actually give you a valid key, but suppose you guess a likelihood P that they do.
Now you have some scenarios:
1. Don't pay. We're out $C.
2. Do pay, and get a valid key. We're out $R.
3. Do pay, and get no key. We're out $R + $C.
So the limit is at scenario 1 being equal to the combination of 2 and 3.
Set C = PR + (1-P)(R + C), and your max ransom R = CP
(You could probably work in additional costs for cleaning up even if the ransom is paid.)
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by nstj on Friday May 14, 2021 @02:28PM
(#27157938)
I mean them publishing your data not you getting it back
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by xphos on Thursday May 13, 2021 @12:22PM
(#27143963)
That requires you to have that kind of data. The company could have be operating legally and not have compromising stuff. The ransomware team gains nothing if a company refuses to pay and has everything to lose by hacking. If there price is to high they are taking on a lot of risk for no reason. Hacks are smart people (I find breaking the law to be a bad decision but if one does it knowing the consequences and mitigations then they aren't dumb just unethical)