News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One person's war on junk mail (1996) by philwelch on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @08:20PM (#27136878)
> People also forget that the postal system was created explicitly by the constitution.

No—the constitution authorizes Congress “to establish post offices and post roads”. It does not obligate them to do so any more than it obligates them to declare war or hire pirates, to name two other clauses of the exact same section.

Re:One person's war on junk mail (1996) by sio8ohPi on Thursday May 13, 2021 @09:24PM (#27149574)
Interestingly, both the postal clause and and letters of marque are hold-overs from the (very few) powers granted by the articles of confederation. Without the power to tax or impose tariffs, I wonder to what degree the postal monopoly was seen as a revenue generating measure.
Re:One person's war on junk mail (1996) by klyrs on Thursday May 13, 2021 @02:57AM (#27139207)
I believe you read the pirate bit wrong

> To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

Re:One person's war on junk mail (1996) by sio8ohPi on Thursday May 13, 2021 @12:07PM (#27143751)
No, right below that: "[congress shall have the power] to declare War, *grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal*, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; "
Re:One person's war on junk mail (1996) by klyrs on Thursday May 13, 2021 @01:46PM (#27145005)
Ah, fair enough. Technically, a privateer is not a pirate... but I'll grant that's only a technical distinction.
Re:One person's war on junk mail (1996) by philwelch on Thursday May 13, 2021 @03:37PM (#27146365)
Privateers are a type of pirate, and pirates would sometimes alternate between privateering and freelance piracy based on what was more lucrative at the time.