Re:Volvo and Daimler bet on hydrogen truck boom this decade
by jsight on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @02:11PM
(#27133373)
You'd likely get by with dropping the match into gasoline most of the time too. Its not definite that there will be vapor from it in the right mix for it to catch fire before hitting the surface.
Gasoline also isn't quite as combustible as people imagine.
Re:Volvo and Daimler bet on hydrogen truck boom this decade
by nostromo on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @02:32PM
(#27133584)
It's worth noting that hydrogen fires burn bright and quickly, but tend to not be very dangerous to people.
Gasoline and batteries are heavy and tend to stick to surfaces (including people) when they burn, almost like napalm. Hydrogen rushes upwards, away from people and surfaces, as it burns, and is generally quickly exhausted.
Re:Volvo and Daimler bet on hydrogen truck boom this decade
by linuxftw on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @02:34PM
(#27133596)
I strongly disagree with this statement.
Re:Volvo and Daimler bet on hydrogen truck boom this decade
by jsight on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @02:39PM
(#27133643)
I'm not sure what there is to disagree with. Fire around gasoline is dangerous for a number of reasons, but liquid gasoline pooled just isn't as volatile as people imagine.
The vapors are different. See both sides of this coin here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsZOE1nvlhI
Also, this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vln5-HZpgcA
Don't try this at home. Vapors can change things dramatically and horribly. The videos lightly demonstrate this too, but it can be worse.
Re:Volvo and Daimler bet on hydrogen truck boom this decade
by linuxftw on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @03:00PM
(#27133888)
Liquid gasoline without the present of vapor is pretty much nonexistent. Dropping a match into some is going to be a problem.
Re:Volvo and Daimler bet on hydrogen truck boom this decade
by throwaway0a5e on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @02:49PM
(#27133771)
In my experience the combustibility of det fuel and similar petroleum products depends primarily on whether the context of the conversation is praising modern safety engineering or heckling someone for using diesel as a cleaning solvent.
On the other hand, H2 would have exploded just from the spark of lighting the match.