News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by sneak on Sunday May 09, 2021 @12:23AM (#27093222)
Messages' end to end cryptography are actively backdoored for the FBI.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-fbi-icloud-exclusiv...

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by petmon on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:19AM (#27093432)
If Messages E2E crypto were backdoored, then why would the FBI take an interest in iCloud backups?

I too wish iCloud backups were E2E encrypted, but that is a very different claim from "Apple assumes you desire privacy from everyone but Apple." Apple knows you want privacy from Apple; their privacy policy is quite explicit about what data Apple cannot see.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209110

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by sneak on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:59AM (#27093608)
iCloud Backup backs up the messages, or the message sync key in the case of Messages in iCloud being enabled.

iCloud Backup is not e2e encrypted, which means Apple either gets the full iMessage and SMS history (in the case of Messages in iCloud being disabled), or gets the e2e encryption key to decrypt the synced Messages in iCloud (which they already have, due to running iCloud).

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by petmon on Sunday May 09, 2021 @04:30AM (#27094281)
Yes we agree that Apple has the technical capability of decrypting Messages that have been backed up by users who have enabled iCloud Backup, even if those messages were previously E2E encrypted. I think Apple should fix that.

Your link describes in detail what Apple can and cannot read. They seem to want their customers to know. So how did you conclude "Apple assumes you desire privacy from everyone but Apple?"

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by sneak on Sunday May 09, 2021 @06:29AM (#27094829)
I belive that most users, after reading 202303 and Apple's public communications around privacy, would incorrectly conclude that Apple cannot read their iMessages.
Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by ViViDboarder on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:20AM (#27093436)
Your link doesn’t say anything like that. It talks about how Apple was planning to add e2ee encrypted backups of iMessages to iCloud but instead opted not to offer them as e2ee backups.

If you don’t enable backups for iMessages, they stay on your device.

Nowhere does it describe a back door that the FBI has access to.

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by sneak on Sunday May 09, 2021 @02:02AM (#27093620)
> If you don’t enable backups for iMessages, they stay on your device.

The backups are enabled by default, on your device, as well as the devices of everyone else you iMessage with.

For iMessage to be end to end secured, you need to turn off iCloud Backup on each and every device you have, and everyone you iMessage with needs to turn off iCloud Backup on each and every device they have. If either you or your conversation partner misses a single device, Apple will get either the message text itself in the backup (if Messages in iCloud is disabled) or the message sync encryption key (if Messages in iCloud is enabled).

In practice, this never happens. Non-e2e iCloud Backup is an iMessage cryptographic backdoor.

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by nl on Sunday May 09, 2021 @02:18AM (#27093682)
Saying that defaults are insecure (which is the case here) is different to the claim there is a backdoor.

A backdoor is a very specific claim that isn't backed up.

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by sneak on Sunday May 09, 2021 @02:25AM (#27093717)
Key escrow for the FBI was a cryptographic backdoor during the crypto wars in the 90s, and it is still the same today.

Defaults matter.

Apple had a plan to secure it, and (I understand) a partial implementation. It was killed specifically to aid surveillance capabilities. If that isn't a backdoor, I don't know what is.

Re:Apple brass discussed disclosing 128M iPhone hack, then d... by TheSpiceIsLife on Sunday May 09, 2021 @02:35AM (#27093757)
There's still people willing to claim USA government law enforcement and security agencies don't have privileged access to US big tech company data.

You're not going to find proof in the EULA.