Re:Rust for Windows 0.9
by dataflow on Saturday May 08, 2021 @06:08AM
(#27085634)
They use that excuse but it doesn't explain the fact that they had alternatives like "the Windows Linux Subsystem" or "the Windows Rust library"...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Even "Rust Library for Windows" (or why not just "Rust Windows API Library") would be more clear.
I think the legal issue was that you don't want to start with a trademark name since it suggests endorsement/support from that party.
Doesn't "Rust for Windows" start with a trademark name?