News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by refurb on Saturday May 08, 2021 @04:49AM (#27085188)
I mean yeah, it’s marginal, but $45k-58k is taxed at 8%, then $33k-$46k is taxed at 6%.

Those aren’t low rates compared to other states, especially considering the COL.

Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by secabeen on Saturday May 08, 2021 @09:06AM (#27086790)
They're not low, certainly, but they aren't extravagant, and they are offset by low property taxes (California 1%, Texas 1.80%, New Hampshire 2.18%), even more so once you've been in a place some years, and are benefiting from Prop 13.
Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by refurb on Saturday May 08, 2021 @10:50AM (#27087634)
Uh, no, 1% isn’t not a low tax rate when’s starter single family home in the Bay Area is $1M.
Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by seanmcdirmid on Saturday May 08, 2021 @05:21PM (#27090823)
Californian valuations are fixed in their increases by prop 13, so over time your property taxes will go down, restive to inflation at least.
Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by refurb on Saturday May 08, 2021 @10:07PM (#27092535)
Sure, if housing prices increase at the same rate as the last 30 years there is a huge benefit, but regardless if you buy today you’ll have a massive property tax bill.
Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:14PM (#27097702)
Yes, and it really isn’t fair, but prop 13 wasn’t about fairness.
Re:California population declines for first time in more tha... by seanmcdirmid on Saturday May 08, 2021 @10:06AM (#27087254)
You have to look at what your effective rate is. If you make $100k, you’ll pay 6% effective.