News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018) by SubiculumCode on Thursday May 06, 2021 @10:56PM (#27071556)
If we all moved to impossible beef, cattle populations would plummet. However, despite popular perception, for most of its life before slaughter, a cow is raised in large open ranges for grazing, like in the California foothills. Only the last parts of their live do they get put into crowded feedlots for "fattening", which might be described as inhumane. Perhaps, it would lead to the advent of wild cattle in the California hills, as land owners stop caring.
Re:Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018) by spicymaki on Friday May 07, 2021 @12:28AM (#27072122)
Two things:

Cattle are slaughtered within 1-2 years and they are held in feed lots for 1/3 of that time.

Cattle slaughtered for veal are caged and do not live in any humane conditions.

I would certainly not want to exist.

Re:Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018) by SubiculumCode on Friday May 07, 2021 @03:08PM (#27079698)
re veal: How many people eat veal these days?
Re:Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018) by daddylongstroke on Saturday May 08, 2021 @09:42AM (#27087040)
In the US, not so many. In the rest of the world, quite a lot. It seems this "ethical dilemma" is a US or Western-centric 1st world problem.
Re:Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018) by tablespoon on Thursday May 06, 2021 @11:03PM (#27071628)
> Perhaps, it would lead to the advent of wild cattle in the California hills, as land owners stop caring.

Which would be an invasive species.

Re:Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018) by SubiculumCode on Thursday May 06, 2021 @11:30PM (#27071818)
indeed. making the thing even more hilarious.