> their sustaining success absolutely must be
Isnt that just survivorship bias?
I find going from 0 to 1 much more interesting than 1 to n though, since 0 to 1 seems far less understood.
As do I, what I'm addressing here is a question of "do they have some kind of special staying power" which is in my mind, an absolute yes.
Its understanding how they managed that that you can work your back to 0, I think. There is value in that
How about these examples? Amiga had customers, and was profitable, yet Amiga is no longer a force in the computing, nor is Commodore.
Both had more (arguably) capable operating systems than Windows (until at least Windows 95), yet, no sustaining power.
Look at the sustaining power of iOS and Android, despite other more capable competitors that tried to win market share (Windows Phone, WebOS, and I really wanted WebOS to win, mind you)