UFOs shows government competence as either surprisingly high or low

Re:UFOs shows government competence as either surprisingly h... by stevenhuang on Thursday May 06, 2021 @01:15PM (#27066337)

I've been following this topic closely and it was never the case that there was a definitive explanation.

There were many theories and counter theories. It would be misleading to say the matter is settled.

It's also doubtful to propose this is a technology demonstration. The ability to track objects is not a differentiator; there are plenty videos online showing similar HUDs. In any case the public release has been degraded specifically to withhold information on their optical capabilities.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UFOs shows government competence as either surprisingly h... by sthnblllII on Thursday May 06, 2021 @02:45PM (#27067514)

That is simply not true. Here are the explanations for all three at a middle school level. There is literally nothing interesting in those videos and interpreting them as evidence as Extraterrestrial Aliens is simply inexcusable at this point.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jWWGmiZs4JA&pbjreload=101

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UFOs shows government competence as either surprisingly h... by stevenhuang on Saturday May 08, 2021 @10:52AM (#27087651)

Those explanations are misguided and thunderfoot is just rehashing (badly) the points raised by Mike West. See commentary by David Fravor, one of the jet pilots in the incident https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB8zcAttP1E&t=9671s

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UFOs shows government competence as either surprisingly h... by sthnblllII on Tuesday May 11, 2021 @02:56AM (#27115021)

David Fravor's testimony is contradicted by the video evidence. What specifically in Dr. Mason's analysis do you think is incorrect? Thanks.

[ Parent | on HN ]