Re:White House eyes subsidies for nuclear plants to help mee...
by vidarh on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @12:10PM
(#27051767)
They are huge, but they're also rare, and excessive. Especially for Chernobyl the exclusion zone includes vast areas no more radioactive than, say, Denver or other high altitude cities, and people kept working at Chernobyl (several of the reactors remained operational) for many years, and people have kept living within the exclusion zones. It was probably the right thing to set it as big as it was given we didn't know better at the time, but if anything Chernobyl has shown that the effects are far less severe than feared.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:White House eyes subsidies for nuclear plants to help mee...
by politician on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @02:54PM
(#27054110)
Yeah, but per the Musk quote, I bet you really could pack enough solar panels into the Chernobyl exclusion zone to overtake the power produced by the plant itself.
Re:White House eyes subsidies for nuclear plants to help mee...
by vidarh on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @03:40PM
(#27054658)
Quite possibly. But that is the only plant in the world with an exclusion zone that big, so it doesn't generalize. As such it's meaningless.
It's likely to remain the only one with an exclusion zone that big given what we have learned about how low the lethality of Chernobyl was.