News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by KptMarchewa on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @05:32AM (#27047899)
Different class shares should be illegal.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by beambot on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @06:25AM (#27048216)
A huge fraction of publicly traded companies have preferred stock in addition to their standard ticker... They just have different terms (eg pricing vs underlying, dividends, etc).
Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by rhyswallace on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @06:23AM (#27048193)
And why's that?
Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by rjmunro on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @09:35AM (#27049611)
Because the owner of the other class of share believes themselves to own part of the company, but they don't. It's confusing. What you really own is some sort of bond from the company that guarantees they will pay you an amount equivalent to a dividend or something, not a share of the company.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by dragonwriter on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @10:21PM (#27137724)
> Because the owner of the other class of share believes themselves to own part of the company, but they don't.

Shares, whether in one class or many, are packages of claims against the company, not really ownership of the company in the simple sense. That’s fairly fundamental to the corporate form as distinct from, say, partnerships.

Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by KptMarchewa on Thursday May 06, 2021 @05:36PM (#27069345)
Because shares express ownership, and ownership is defined by being able to make decisions about the owned thing.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price is too high for Nasdaq c... by TeaSea on Thursday May 06, 2021 @08:03PM (#27070362)
both BRK.B and BRK.A have voting rights.