Re:First genetically modified mosquitoes released in the Uni...
by rcMgD2BwE72F on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @03:50AM
(#27034969)
Scientists have troubles envisioning a sustainable world in the coming decades (due to the ongoing, human-driven, accelerating collapse of biodiversity) but somehow we may save the world in millions of years? See IPBES report for a summary.
Maybe we should focus on the pressing and critical issues instead of worsening them in the hope that a distant event could justify our suicidal behavior.
Re:First genetically modified mosquitoes released in the Uni...
by pembrook on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @12:40PM
(#27039547)
Seems we're already working on fixing the problem, no? Hence why the IPBES report exists!
But if this modern narrative of "We've angered the gods!" makes you feel good, I'm not sure anything I can say will refute your certainty about our coming doom.
Re:First genetically modified mosquitoes released in the Uni...
by rcMgD2BwE72F on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @01:53PM
(#27040411)
I did not mention any god nor was I trying to make anyone feel good or bad. What's your point?
Re:First genetically modified mosquitoes released in the Uni...
by developer93 on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @04:01AM
(#27035045)
That's a big if though
The sun will destroy earth in 2-5 billion years. But before then, an asteroid will likely destroy all most/all life on earth in the next couple hundred million years or so. And before that, a super volcano will likely destroy most/all of the animal and plant life on earth.
Assuming human technology advances fast enough to avoid catastrophic climate change and MAD succeeds at keeping us from destroying the earth ourselves , we're the only species that has a shot at making any "not-human-centric ecosystem" survive beyond earth.
(ignoring any life that may exist outside our solar system)
Of course, 22 Billion years from now the entire universe might die and kill everything anyways, but we may end up giving Bambi & friends a few billion years of existence they wouldn't have otherwise had. So I'd call that a net gain.