Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake court order

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by ylere on Monday May 03, 2021 @06:37PM (#27031763)

dark.fail used to host up-to-date links to many major darknet sites hosted on the tor network. The attacker kept the site online with minor changes and now anyone who visits these links will have the connection go through MITM proxies and their credentials stolen. It's difficult to understand why namecheap hasn't at least shut down the domain after days of this going on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by codsane on Monday May 03, 2021 @06:57PM (#27031980)

Very unfortunate that Namecheap isn’t cooperating. Not really sure what the hold up is, some say it’s related to the Namecheap vs. Tucows lawsuit [0], but realistically it wouldn’t make much sense to do something like this out of spite. I wonder if they’re worried about potential legal obligations of turning over such a “controversial” domain?

[0] https://domainnamewire.com/2018/11/08/namecheap-and-tucows-s...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by viraptor on Monday May 03, 2021 @07:36PM (#27032285)

The alternative is that they keep serving that controversial domain instead, which likely isn't a good position either.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by ryanlol on Monday May 03, 2021 @08:28PM (#27032681)

It can be slow and difficult to authenticate a court order.

Returning the domain to it’s previous criminal operators might not be the best idea either. Other very similar sites have faced issues with the DOJ.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by ryanlol on Monday May 03, 2021 @08:31PM (#27032710)

This sounds like something actual law enforcement would do.

Why should namecheap shut down a potential law enforcement operation targeting darknet criminals?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by creatonez on Monday May 03, 2021 @10:32PM (#27033463)

I think they should protest. Not all of the contents made accessible via the page was even illegal, and the page itself is not illegal. Law enforcement shouldn't expect to always get more surveillance tools than they need.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Sunde: dark.fail domain was hijacked through fake c... by ryanlol on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @04:48AM (#27035362)

> Not all of the contents made accessible via the page was even illegal

Would you say the same if 30% of the links on the site were to child pornography? Why does it matter that some of the links on the page were to legit content? DDW did the same and was still shut down by the DOJ.

> and the page itself is not illegal

I doubt that there are many places in the world where getting paid to distribute links to darknet drug markets isn’t illegal. The US certainly isn’t one of those places.

[ Parent | on HN ]