Re:Supreme Court: first amendment allows mature video games ...
by bdunbar on Monday June 27, 2011 @01:42PM
(#2702186)
> I'm worried about the slippery slope
Thank you.
>> But that's why we have parents
> So, you'd rather make their job harder?
It's not my place to make another parent's job hard. Or easy.
I don't expect or want the government to tell me what my kids can, and cannot see. That's my job, my burden. It's what I signed on for when I had kids and got married.
Re:Supreme Court: first amendment allows mature video games ...
by niels_olson on Monday June 27, 2011 @03:31PM
(#2702648)
And part of our burden is having the conversation. Part of our burden is trying to make the society we want our kids to live in. I frankly have no problem with slapping Gamestop with some hefty fines if they decide to start selling scantily clad, dripping-with-blod warrior princesses to my kids for $19.95.
Re:Supreme Court: first amendment allows mature video games ...
by johnsonman on Monday June 27, 2011 @04:13PM
(#2702833)
Do you apply this to other mediums, such as movies? They are also self-regulated, so theoretically your kids could also purchase "scantily clad, dripping-with-blod warrior princess"-themed movies from a video store that isn't following the industry regulations.
I'm not worried about addiction. I'm worried about the slippery slope of becoming complicit in cooperating with people who engage in torture.
> But that's why we have parents
So, you'd rather make their job harder?