News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via... by briefcomment on Sunday May 02, 2021 @01:14PM (#27016920)
This makes the analogy even more appropriate. We know the spike protein is harmful in some amount, but we think a small enough amount produced forever should be safe. Maybe we'll learn otherwise.
Re:SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via... by yborg on Sunday May 02, 2021 @01:40PM (#27017137)
Why do you think it is produced forever? The mRNA quickly degrades in the body and the injected cells will stop producing the spike protein. That's why there has to be a second injection.
Re:SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via... by rzz3 on Sunday May 02, 2021 @02:15PM (#27017459)
Is there a source? 100% believe you, but due to the conflicting posts I’d love to read the source (and I don’t know what to Google). Thanks!
Re:SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via... by Kubuxu on Sunday May 02, 2021 @02:44PM (#27017726)
(m)RNA is inherently unstable in our body: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messenger_RNA#Degradation
Re:SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via... by rrss on Sunday May 02, 2021 @01:23PM (#27016994)
> small enough amount produced forever should be safe

does 'forever' modify 'produced' or 'should be safe'? if the former, what produces a small amount of the spike protein forever (continuing, not just a small amount one time)?