News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I need to explain to you just how dire America's Pokémon ... by nonameiguess on Saturday May 01, 2021 @02:40PM (#27008655)
How are you calculating the left over income? Going to the BLS tables that Judgmentality linked to, specifically this one (https://www.bls.gov/cex/tables/calendar-year/mean-item-share...) showing income and spending by decile from 2019, it isn't until 6th decile that after-tax income for the mean household is greater than expenditures. Everyone in the lower half of American income spends more than they earn. It isn't until 8th decile that after-tax income exceeds expenditures by more than $1,000 a month. Those numbers are $93,571 and $75,945 annually, for $1,468 excess. In 7th decile, they're $74,234 and $66,435, for $649 monthly leftover.
Re:I need to explain to you just how dire America's Pokémon ... by jandrewrogers on Saturday May 01, 2021 @06:10PM (#27010340)
That BLS table contains all expenditure categories they track, including expenses which are not "ordinary" in BLS parlance, which is incorrect for these purposes. An expenditure is "ordinary" if the vast majority of Americans spend part of their income on it, regardless of how or how much people spend -- a lot of objectively luxury spending is classified as ordinary. In practice, ordinary expenditures captures every kind of reasonable living expense most people think of as typical for living in America, with no frugality implied.

The BLS calculates discretionary income by subtracting all ordinary expenditures from income in a given decile. Which is ~$1,000/month for the median household. Some of that leftover money may be spent on non-ordinary expenditures, like the odd expensive hobby or lifestyle flex, which is also captured in this table but is not included in the cost of living an ordinary life. I find this to be an eminently reasonable approach to inductively measuring the cost of an ordinary life without making a judgement if some spending is excessive or luxury. Spending money on a car is an ordinary expense, the BLS doesn't care if it is a Honda or a Ferrari, both are included.

This explains another apparent anomaly as well: ~35% of households have no meaningful discretionary income, yet only about ~15% (per Federal Reserve studies) have difficulty paying their bills. Because there is a substantial amount of luxury spending padding the ordinary costs of living, households in the 15-35% range have significant elasticity in how much they spend in some of these categories.