Re:SSD makers start warning that mining products like ChiaCo...
by lottin on Saturday May 01, 2021 @03:12AM
(#27004039)
Bitcoin provides literally no property rights. All bitcoin does is say this address has that many bitcoins (in this particular blockchain).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SSD makers start warning that mining products like ChiaCo...
by inter_netuser on Saturday May 01, 2021 @07:28AM
(#27005381)
It doesn't provide any property rights? Well then, why don't you go ahead and help yourself with some billions in Bitcoin from Musk's personal holdings? Should be easy, according to you.
I think you'll find that it's much much easier to repossess a house, rather than repossess a bitcoin address with billions.
Here's a detailed analysis by a law professor from a reputable law school on Bitcoin as a property rights system: https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1676...
Re:SSD makers start warning that mining products like ChiaCo...
by throw0101a on Saturday May 01, 2021 @08:40AM
(#27005797)
> Well then, why don't you go ahead and help yourself with some billions in Bitcoin from Musk's personal holdings?
Give me a rubber hose and $5 wrench and I'll start working on it:
Once it's transferred what recourse does he have to revert it?
> Here's a detailed analysis by a law professor from a reputable law school
Ah yes, the William & Mary Law School. The same law school that birthed the idea that the US Second Amendment was an individual right…
Re:SSD makers start warning that mining products like ChiaCo...
by inter_netuser on Sunday May 02, 2021 @08:52PM
(#27020505)
What are your thoughts on "United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)"?