Why founding a 3-person startup with 0 revenue is better than working for GS

Re:Why founding a 3-person startup with 0 revenue is better ... by bb75 on Monday June 27, 2011 @12:21AM (#2700099)

Yes. Isn't that curious, to say the least? First he complains about becoming a serf at GS - where I am assuming no one hides the fact that everyone is indeed a serf, and the pretense that it is not all about money, is kept at a minimum, if any at all.

If GS was the frying pan, then, in my view, he jumped into the fire at Facebook where he is now working for an adolescent-minded, untransformed individual, who traded his personal integrity for the fruits of lust - "success, sex, money, fame" - under the guise of "helping connect people"...

Goes to show you that the old Buckaroo Banzai saying holds true for Antonio as well... Whereever you go, Antonio, there you are. Still a wannabe human being... with much growing left over to do.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why founding a 3-person startup with 0 revenue is better ... by orijing on Monday June 27, 2011 @03:19AM (#2700459)

adolescent-minded, untransformed individual, who traded his personal integrity for the fruits of lust - "success, sex, money, fame" - under the guise of "helping connect people"...

The Movie does not count as a valid reference.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why founding a 3-person startup with 0 revenue is better ... by MaxGabriel on Monday June 27, 2011 @03:57AM (#2700538)

Also his prof from Harvard said that was nothing like him, plus credible sources like LAT pretty much concluding the movie was bs

Also, to bb75, isn't that a little black and white? Facebook doesn't give all its money to charity so its as bad as GS?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why founding a 3-person startup with 0 revenue is better ... by irahul on Monday June 27, 2011 @08:20AM (#2701029)

> under the guise of "helping connect people"...

And the guise is working pretty well. It's really connecting people.

[ Parent | on HN ]