News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists re-evaluating relative brain size and mammalia... by sprafa on Friday April 30, 2021 @04:02AM (#26990869)
You should read more about IQ and it’s failure to predict success. Like Nassim Taleb has said - IQ just shows you’re not dumb, not that you’re smart.

Which you are a perfect example of, I’m sure.

Re:Scientists re-evaluating relative brain size and mammalia... by bloak on Friday April 30, 2021 @04:30AM (#26991033)
IQ is, by definition, how well you perform at solving a particular kind of puzzle. "Success" means fulfilling whichever criteria you have defined for a particular goal/objective.

IQ results are of some use in predicting how well children will do at school, i.e. what exam results they will get after being taught. That's usually a "success criterion" for the school, though not necessarily for the children, who may have other goals in life, e.g. becoming a footballer.

Re:Scientists re-evaluating relative brain size and mammalia... by User23 on Friday April 30, 2021 @10:59AM (#26994293)
Players that want to play football in the NFL have to take an IQ test[1] and score decently well. Using a rough conversion[2], NFL teams require a minimum IQ in the low 90s to play, because players below that threshold are incapable of learning the plays[3]. So even for persons who want to play competitive football, a certain level of intelligence is extremely important.

I don't know much about soccer beyond pickup games, is it roughly as cognitively demanding as football at the highest levels?

[1] https://jobdescriptionandresumeexamples.com/10-important-fac...

[2] https://wonderlictestpractice.com/how-does-the-wonderlic-cor...

[3] https://clutchpoints.com/patriots-news-new-england-requires-...