News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Labor Secretary throws support behind classifying gi... by munk-a on Thursday April 29, 2021 @03:46PM (#26985787)
I suspect that was a misstatement - I haven't seen a proposal that avoids higher taxes without a large debt being written against something else (i.e. redirecting funding from the military). It is, however, accurate to say that personal out-of-pocket expenses wouldn't increase for most individuals. The cost per patient for government funded healthcare is expected to significantly undercut private costs per patient due to some efficiencies of scale and removal of some pretty big market friction points - so less money would end up being extracted from the economy to pay for an equivalent level of care.

In short - you can buy a banana for a dime or give the government a nickle and get a "free" banana.

Re:U.S. Labor Secretary throws support behind classifying gi... by maxerickson on Thursday April 29, 2021 @03:56PM (#26985900)
Medicare just forces providers to take less money than insurance companies, it's efficient in some sense, but it's not operational efficiency.

I'm super glad my mom has Medicare! But she isn't benefitting from it being efficient, she's benefitting from it setting the rate it pays and requiring providers to accept it.

Re:U.S. Labor Secretary throws support behind classifying gi... by munk-a on Thursday April 29, 2021 @05:12PM (#26986775)
To clarify a bit these market insights don't just come from comparisons to medicare but by comparing patient care costs to similarly developed nations and trying to account for factors like the obesity epidemic - the US just pays a lot more for a patient to get treatment than similar countries.