> fake meak was proven to be non-healhtly

Here [0] is a series of nine short videos (with text transcripts and links to all scientific sources) on plant-based meat substitutes' health and environmental impact. The reported findings go against your claim.

[0] https://nutritionfacts.org/video/the-environmental-impacts-o...

Nutritionfacts is ideologically driven[1], advocating a plant-based diet. What exactly did you expect?

Actual "nutrition facts" are few and far between. I could selectively cite all kinds of studies that go for or against veganism. They're all flawed in some way, so people can just dismiss what they don't want to hear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Greger

They advocate a whole-foods plant-based diet. Meats/cheeses made out of plants aren't whole foods though. Generally we have to think critically and scrutinize sources cited and if they back up claims made. Do you have some such specific objection in this case?

Fake meat was never made because of the health benefits. People want impossible burgers because they are unhealthy and taste like burgers.

> meat and cheese are what they are because the animals eat plenty of things and they are living creatures, you can't replicate this

I mean, you certainly can. Look at the companies making 'clean' meat and fish.