Re:Diffie-Hellman for the layman
by boris1 on Friday May 07, 2021 @01:37PM
(#27078569)
I've now implemented folder encryption. If you encrypt folder 'foo', you get the file 'foo.encrypted'. When you decrypt it using the same tool, you get file 'foo.zip' which you download and uncompress into a folder 'foo'.
Re:Diffie-Hellman for the layman
by davidhyde on Saturday May 01, 2021 @05:29AM
(#27004747)
> “ When WhatsApp was pressured to leave a backdoor into the encryption, it said “no” but instead agreed to log and report all dubious communication before it is encrypted. ”
Re:Diffie-Hellman for the layman
by boris1 on Sunday May 02, 2021 @02:23AM
(#27012775)
The check digits solve the MITM problem. You should compare them by another channel than email, such as text message. This is called "Short Authentication String" (SAS).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElGamal_encryption
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElGamal_signature_scheme
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taher_Elgamal
Huh, I did not know that!
That is, how email exchange can be guaranteed to work properly, and MITM won't insert his email in the middle of the process?
Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-in-the-middle_attack#Authe...