News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by redthrowaway on Saturday June 25, 2011 @10:04PM (#2697184)
This mirrors an idea that I had. TOR is a military project, and you know at least some of the exit nodes are controlled by the US gov't. Why not replicate TOR with a botnet? Bounce your communications around a plethora of average joes and you have yourself a more stable tor. If you spread the botnet without a CnC server and have the infected machines bounce random traffic around, it would be damned difficult to break. TOR is open source, so it shouldn't be too hard to modify it to work on a private network. The nice thing about it is that if you attract to much heat you can always ditch the network and start a new one.
Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by getsat on Sunday June 26, 2011 @01:06AM (#2697419)
> you know at least some of the exit nodes are controlled by the US gov't

http://www.google.com/search?q=high+traffic+colluding+tor+ro...

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by redthrowaway on Sunday June 26, 2011 @04:57PM (#2699055)
Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by getsat on Monday June 27, 2011 @12:18AM (#2700092)
Oh, neat. I didn't realise the issue had been resolved. Thanks.
Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by count on Monday June 27, 2011 @08:40AM (#2701083)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7nfN4bOOQI

People do run their own private onions.