Re:DRPC, a Replacement for gRPC
by taklimakan on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @08:32AM
(#26968603)
> Where gRPC needs improvement: Let’s just get out here and say what not enough people are saying—in a nutshell, gRPC has feature creep, bloat and is trying to solve too many problems. It’s overcomplicated and has become a dumping ground of features, tangled in a standards body-based web of crap.
It sounds like they deemed more cost-effective to rewrite the protocol than learning how to use `grpc.Dial`
It sounds like they deemed more cost-effective to rewrite the protocol than learning how to use `grpc.Dial`