News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neutron stars may be bigger than expected, measurement of... by samatman on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @12:47AM (#26965705)
The wrinkle in your question which sibling comments miss is this: it's difficult to reason about how a photon 'experiences' things under any circumstances.

No, not because they don't have sensory organs or the like, we can wave that aside, but because time doesn't pass for objects moving at the speed of light. It's so compressed that everything is instantaneous: a photon from another galaxy arrives in our eyeballs at the same moment it is emitted.

So you're asking a question about the duration experience around a black hole, of a particle which can't have duration experience.

Re:Neutron stars may be bigger than expected, measurement of... by colechristensen on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @02:14AM (#26966242)
Yes I was a bit imprecise and wandered about with my various examples... a photon doesn't experience time but an observers in a reference frame inertial-ish to the microwave background and generally far away from a gravity well will have a consistent agreement of when a photon is emitted, when it crosses an event horizon, and perhaps what happens to that photon as the black hole evolves. From the photon's experience it is emitted and absorbed at the same instance, my questions about duration are about how an external observer would assign times and locations to events for that photon.