News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why UML “Really” Died by nightski on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @02:47PM (#26959854)
I'd argue as well that type systems in the extremely popular programming languages make it difficult to reduce the surface area of your problem appropriately as well.

Some more fringe languages make significant strides in this with dependent types.

The burden is much higher on tests than it needs to be because we can't express these constraints in code well enough.

Re:Why UML “Really” Died by kragen on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @03:41PM (#26960504)
Which dependently-typed languages have you found most productive?