News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Climate change and the 1991-2020 U.S. Climate Normals by notafraudster on Monday April 26, 2021 @04:16PM (#26947496)
Right, the comment surely should have said "substantively significant" and not statistically significant, since statistical significance is a product of not just effect size but also sample size and estimator efficiency (and, indeed, chosen alpha -- anything can be significant if you make the alpha large enough)
Re:Climate change and the 1991-2020 U.S. Climate Normals by comte7092 on Monday April 26, 2021 @04:24PM (#26947599)
Yeah, one of my major frustrations is how poorly framed statistical significance is in popular media.