I'm a bit confused about the logic here. Roku seems to be claiming that YouTube TV has a dominant position, and Google is threatening to withhold it to get unfair benefits for the unrelated YouTube app. But the directionality is the wrong way around; YouTube TV the smaller of those services by orders of magnitude. It's dominates nothing at all, and it's a small miracle that it still exists at all. How could it possibly be used to extract unfair concessions?

Does anyone have a link to the full statement? Maybe this got garbled by the reporting somehow.